Informational opacity regarding Chávez works for unity and the myth
Uncertainty remains one week after the arrival of the Venezuelan Head of State
"The government is not supplying true and accurate information, as set forth in Article 58 of the Constitution," reckon journalists specialized in the field of communication.
However, they are afraid that such uncertain, mixed-up versions form part of a faultless communication strategy on President Chávez's health condition.
"We have spent more than 70 days without the president being sworn in; with serious doubts about his government ability, yet in Venezuela there is no crisis as to lack of governance. There might be demonstrations, yet they are focused," said Andrés Cańizález, a researcher and professor with Andrés Bello Catholic University and the author of "La presidencia mediática" (The media presidency).
"Reports that say nothing are provided; pictures are shown; but at the end of the day, it is a message addressed to Chávez's grassroots supporters and the global community," the researcher maintains. As far as he is concerned, Chávez's absence for health reasons following the abuse of his image throughout 13 years is a major inflection point. "The government has managed to survive Chávezism without Chávez at this moment, from the communicational viewpoint, and that has been effective."
In the opinion of researcher and Professor Marcelino Bisbal, government informational opacity is present not only with regard to the president's health, but also in economic matters. "They initially denied devaluation and later the exchange rate adjustment took place; this was the case for the VAT... One just stopped trusting the government information." Nonetheless, the issue of the president's health takes precedence over major subjects. "There is strategic handling of the communicational policy that has worked nicely for them, because the country media agenda is focused on the issue; the intention is making us forget about the number of problems."
Bisbal interprets that in this context of informational opacity, the announcement on the establishment of the National Bolivarian Communication and Information System cannot be put down to chance. It will be used not only to disseminate "contents at the level of the political challenge of our people, who elected President Chávez," as Villegas put it. It will also enhance the State hegemony over the media.
"Such a system is not new and it is addressed to Chávezism without Chávez. The president, without being among us, except for ads, in community media outlets and songs, has a symbolic presence. I feel that they are working on the president's image and his illness to create a myth in the style of Perón and Evita... and I think this is the way."
Translated by Conchita Delgado
José Vicente Rangel clearly said: "We are not conducting negotiations threatened with a gun in the head." He warned behind closed doors in the midst of the social upheaval occurred during the oil strike in 2002 and 2003. Dissenting Timoteo Zambrano answered back that no other option was available: "The thing is that otherwise, you do not negotiate."