Attorney at Law: Venezuelan rule of law is adrift
The director of non-governmental organization (NGO) Foro Penal Venezolano (Venezuelan Criminal Forum), Alfredo Romero, regarded decision of Venezuelan top court as a legal aberration that must be cleared out
In a video-chat with daily newspaper El Universal, the director of non-governmental organization (NGO) Foro Penal Venezolano (Venezuelan Criminal Forum), Alfredo Romero, said that the rule of law in Venezuela "is adrift" upon the ruling of the Supreme Tribunal of Justice (TSJ), which consents the Government's administrative continuity.
Romero asserted that the top court's decision is ambiguous and for such a reason he filed a request to elaborate on the TSJ decision that was eventually refused. "Upon this procedure, the Constitutional Court's magistrates said that I was disrespectful for having said that the January 9 ruling was a judicial aberration. The court misinterpreted the Constitution and it must be cleared out."
"Having the Constitutional Court determined that the permission granted by the National Assembly to President Hugo Chávez to undergo a surgery in Cuba did not represent a temporary absence is by no means in compliance with the Laws." Moreover, the decision supports the thesis that temporary absences are decided by the president. Hence, we requested an explanation to understand their legal basis," Romero stated.
At first she agreed that I use her real name, that she had no problems with that at all. After all, living with HIV had driven her to help others – as a workshop facilitator giving talks and conducting seminars, or as a volunteer for local AIDS Service Organizations like Acción Solidaria (Solidary Action) and Mujeres Unidas por la Salud (Women United for Health, or Musa), a support group network for HIV-positive women. But when we were well into the interview, the realization that she might lose her private health insurance coverage made her change her mind.