International court rules in favor of Venezuela over gold mines
The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (Icsid) ruled that Venezuela did not breach contractual rights
In the ruling, the arbitration court stated that Venezuela did not breach the Venezuela-Canada bilateral agreement and concluded that Venezuela's decision to terminate the agreement and take over control of Las Cristinas mine is by no means an expropriation.
According to the official communiqué, the top court established that the relevant investment was pursuant to the contract entered into by Venezuelan and Canada. Hence, Venezuela, complied with the provisions on standard fair and equitable treatment set forth in the bilateral agreement for the Promotion and Protection of Investments.
In the claim, Vannessa Ventures sought compensation for USD 1 billion from the Venezuelan government.
Translated by Jhean Cabrera
A simple reason: there is oil galore, would suffice to explain Guyana's actions. Another explanation lies in the little or none efforts made by the Venezuelan government to thwart the move by the Guyanese. This is certainly not a new problem, but a problem only recently highlighted because oil is involved. But what other resources does the disputed area hold? For most of us it is a section on the map with black and white stripes on it, a depiction of something distant, alien, a nothingness not worth paying much attention to in geography classes back in elementary school.