Any society which, for any reason loses its balance, by standing
in the way of innovative or consolidating individuals, ends
up by breaking the system and making them victim of tremendous
troubles and even useless revolutions. We could mention quite
a few cases, but they are beyond the point at issue. Pericles,
an Athenian general and lawmaker, attained unprecedented achievements
in Athens, in his famous Funeral Oration to the fallen during
the first year of the Peloponnesian War -collected by Thucydides-
said: "if no social standing, advancement in public life falls
to reputation for capacity, class considerations not being
allowed to interfere with merit; nor again does poverty bar
the way, if a man is able to serve the state, he is not hindered
by the obscurity of his condition." Those who rowed the ships
of the Athenian navy were citizens chosen by their virtue
and meritorious service in wartime; no matter that the special
shoes and the paddle they held were their only belongings.
Any citizen had access to such honor, provided that his fitness,
perseverance and strive could make him suitable. Only the
best ones went to war, which was viewed as the highest recognition.
Also, businesspersons, some of them very wealthy, such as
Pericles himself, reached outstanding public positions based
on their ability.
Then, it would be not superfluous to say that the Athenian
democracy had merit, regardless of the social or economic
status, as one of their leading principles. Today, this is
known as "meritocracy." Only those who gain their positions
or attain their goals on their own merits are able to play
a salient role; they are able to take up such positions and
goals in their own right or value them fairly.
Awarding these positions in the absence of prior conditions
or tying them automatically to a lower level puts such positions,
goals or achievements at risk of losing relevance, or
even worse, effectiveness. As for any achievements, they may
be let down as conquests.
The aforementioned text quotes another illustrative paragraph:
"We cultivate refinement without extravagance and knowledge
without effeminacy; wealth we employ more for use than for
show, and place the real disgrace of poverty not in owning
to the fact but in declining the struggle against it."
This means that despite fighting for excellence and creating
wealth, the purpose of this polis was just fighting against
poverty and using their revenues to the benefit of all its
citizens.
In short, a democratic system is born and made where, based
on its original equalitarian spirit -which dates back to more
than 2,500 years- recognizes the individual merit as a citizen's
primary value, regardless of the people's origin. Hence, rather
than the force of a faceless group with no individuality and
standardizing the human essence, the development of individual
excellence as part of an open "meritocracy," ensures indeed
the system social and political sustainability, efficacy and
efficiency, far from being doomed to demise.
By making a parallelism with the ancient world, it is worth
remembering that the very Pericles started to build the Parthenon,
a majestic work that has mirrored for thousands of years the
superiority of the Athenian values, their government system
and their way of living. Not only the three most distinguished
men in their field of expertise were retained to design and
execute it -Phideas, Callicratus and Ictinuswas- but the fittest
ordinary people. "the admiration of the present and succeeding
ages will be ours, since we have not left our power without
witness, but have shown it by mighty proofs."
As we get closer to the 100th anniversary of El Universal,
this 99th edition pays tribute both to the individual merit
impersonated in our founder, poet and autodidact Andrés
Mata, and all those Venezuelans who, as their strive to make
the difference as individuals, have served our country. Their
heroism and fame -Pericles said- lies on having escaped dishonor
and "choosing to die resisting, rather than to live submitting"
and resignedly.
|