The fourth court of appeals kept a prohibition on the media to disclose any details about of the judiciary investigation into the murder of public prosecutor Danilo Anderson and about key witness Giovanni Vásquez de Armas
|
|
EDGAR LOPEZ
EL UNIVERSAL
The fourth court of appeals Tuesday dismissed an action seeking
annulment of a decision the sixth crime control court issued
banning the media from disclosing any details about the judiciary
investigation into the November 2004 murder of public prosecutor
Danilo Anderson and about the prosecution's key witness Giovanni
Vásquez de Armas.
Justices Jesús Orangel García and Belkis Cedeño
argued that the plaintiffs -alleged perpetrator Otoniel Guevara,
Teodoro Petkoff, editor of daily newspaper Tal Cual, and the
directors of the Venezuelan Trade Union of Press Workers and
the leaders of the group Expresión Libre- did not take
the necessary legal steps before challenging the media ban
imposed by the sixth crime control court judge Florencio Silano.
Following three hours of deliberations, justice Elsa Gómez
announced that in the file kept at the sixth crime control
court it is certified that a ruling on an appeal local news
TV channel Globovisión filed against Silano's ruling
is still pending, as well as similar actions filed by local
TV channel RCTV.
Based on the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, Supreme
Tribunal of Justice (TSJ,) the fourth court of appeals argued
that plaintiffs did not take all legal necessary steps before
seeking annulment of Silano's ruling. "You cannot invert due
process. Petitions for the protection of constitutional rights
do not have a surrogate character. In the event that the appeal
or petition is dismissed, there are other actions available,
such as requesting annulment of proceedings," Justice Gómez
claimed.
Consequently, a prohibition to disclose the judiciary investigation
into Anderson's murder, and particularly any information on
the private life of Vásquez de Armas is upheld.
Journalism and official truth
Petkoff asserted that reporters committed no crime. They
have a duty to spread information -with no limitations- on
events with a social significance. According to Petkoff, public
prosecutors and court clerks did commit an offense when disclosing
the case files, as they have an obligation to protect such
data.
For example, he claimed, some reporters conducted investigations
showing that extortion could be at the center of Anderson's
murder, as previously suggested by Jesse Chacón, minister
of the Interior and Justice.
Regarding disclosure of details about Vásquez de Armas'
private life, Petkoff reminded that Attorney General Isaías
Rodríguez himself introduced the prosecution key witness
as a psychiatrist. Subsequently, not only did Vásquez
de Armas deny Rodríguez' claims, but he also confessed
to have committed crimes in Colombia and Venezuela.
Translated by Maryflor
Suárez R.
Cómo anunciar |
Suscripciones |
Contáctenos |
Política de privacidad
Términos legales |
Condiciones de uso |
Mapa del Sitio |
Ayuda
El Universal - Todos los derechos reservados 2011

