Advanced Search
 
Caracas, Tuesday October 18 , 2005  
Principal > Daily News > News
 
 
EL UNIVERSAL does not share the view of its columnists (incumbents or occasional contributors) and reserves the right to publish any articles.
Full or partial reproduction is prohibited without the express consent of EL UNIVERSAL board of directors.
 

MICAHEL ROWAN / STORIES WE TELL OURSELVES
Related articles


Michael Rowan
Special for El Universal

Stories play an integral role in the development of national identity. Venezuela's story, which it has been telling itself for a long time, is straightforward: "My country is rich and I'm poor; therefore, my fair share of national wealth has been stolen from me." Chavez pledged to end this story in 1998 and in eight elections since then, insists he has done so. The past has been obliterated. The poor, the many, the black and the good have triumphed over the rich, the few, the white and the evil. But has the story changed?

On TV, the answer is yes. Chavez is a supreme televangelist for his revolution, constantly hectoring, preaching, lecturing, supplicating, amusing, and spinning his web. But on the street, the answer is no. Poverty has increased by one-third in his tenure. Corruption is epidemic. The social fabric is rent asunder. Crime is omnipresent. Chavez blames these failures on conspiratorial propaganda by the US, just as Castro blames his domestic failures on the US embargo of Cuba. Excuses for malfeasance are part of Venezuela's long story, as anyone alive for the last few decades knows.

Chavez uses TV as a weapon of mass distraction to confuse the poor that he is on their side -- but totally in control -- while life's miseries worsen to plague them. He is asking the poor to believe his version of reality and not their experience. A presidential competitor who linked Chavez to the old story could defeat him soundly in the barrios in 2006. To do so, he must show that the state has taken the place of the rich and powerful few against whom Chavez fulminates daily. If the competitor's government program transferred power and wealth from the state directly to the nation's families, a real revolution to end poverty would begin, which the barrios could vote for with confidence.

But traditional politicians are hamstrung to make this case to the barrios. They do not want to acknowledge that the governments of the last 30 years were malfeasant or duplicitous about poverty and corruption. Such an apology would reveal their responsibility for Chavez winning in 1998 and thereafter. Today, many of them would rather stick with poverty, and Chavez, than tell the truth about Venezuela's sad story of failure.
mrowan@cantv.net

Michael Rowan's column is published every Tuesday




 
Print with 
a
Privacy policy | Legal Terms | Terms of use
Advanced Search
Copyright @ Diario El Universal C.A. 2005